Self-Guided and Fully-Guided Sheep Hunts - a Comparison and Contrast
© Jeff R. Filler, 2004
Moscow, Idaho
The task of comparing and contrasting un-guided and fully outfitted-and-guided
bighorn sheep hunts is strangely problematic. I do not have a lot of experience
with guided-outfitted (g/o) hunts, and I suspect in general the g/o hunt would
be a lot less work (for the hunter) than the un-guided, or self-guided hunt ...
animal for animal and area for area. But the wild card is the particular animal
... bighorn sheep. The outfitters out here warn the curious pretty sternly that
even the g/o hunts require top physical condition and the acceptance that meals
may reduce to MREs. Probably the main difference - or perhaps the only
difference one should expect - is all the work beforehand ... scouting, etc.
With sheep, you will probably end up with your animal breathing its last in a
place the outfitter can't get his horses ... and, then, in a moment of silence,
he may very well look at YOU for the closest pack animal.
My dad and I got bighorn sheep this year - mine self-guided, and my dad - on a
fully outfitted and guided hunt. I went on both hunts - and so offer this
comparison contrast.
In comparison, my dad and I drew tags in the most rugged and remote units of
Idaho (and perhaps of the lower 48 United States), units 27-1 and 26. The sheep
dwell in rocky terrain in those units in an elevation band between 5000 and 7000
ft. The canyons themselves in which they dwell are some 6000 ft deep (from 3500
ft to 9500 ft). At the eastern and bottom end of our units is the Middle Fork of
the Salmon River; at the western and upper end, are a few dirt roads that wind
in far from civilization.
Both units are hundreds of square miles in size, are mostly designated
wilderness, and have about 30 miles of common boundary. Common to both units is
the sobering fact that the sheep are at eastern (roadless) end. The best access
to both units is by back country airstrip, where one meets either his starting
point up a trail, or an outfitter and guide with a pack string. Both units are
beautiful and so remote that they are timeless. Both units have been ravaged by
forest fires, and both are 'ground zero' in terms of impact from the wolf
re-introduction.
As a bit of contrast, Unit 27-1 is probably the most difficult hunt of the State
(maybe States?). Twelve Rocky Mountain Big Horn Sheep tags are drawn each year
(for the main early hunt) and typically only two are filled, including those
involving outfitters and guides. Unit 27-1 is probably the easiest to draw,
perhaps related to being the hardest to hunt.
In contrast, Unit 26 is harder to draw but the success rate is much higher;
nearly all tags (2 early and 2 late) are filled. A higher proportion of the 26
hunts are outfitted/guided, probably related to the greater difficulty of
drawing, and the need to 'make it count'. Both units are not scoutable on a
weekend, and so the hunter is dependent on either scouting in pre-season, for
the self guided, or the years of experience of the guide and outfitter.
My hunt was self-guided, and in another article I describe in detail the
ingredients of a successful self-guided hunt. In short, it required a lot of
preparation in terms of scouting, information gathering, and planning. It
required a lifetime accumulation of hunting skill and savvy, and everything in
me physically and pertaining to experience of the outdoors.
On the outfitted and guided hunt my dad went on, and on which I went as an
observer/photographer (and writer), in contrast, we basically had to just show
up. (Well, that is not entirely true - we had to be in reasonably good shape,
and have decent hunting skills. Selection of a good outfitter is the topic of
articles by others.
On a self-guided hunt, everything is on YOU. You have to evaluate the conditions
and the progress of the hunt, determine options, and then decide, and then bear
the consequences of your decisions. On the guided hunt, you may offer input,
help spot, and eventually pull the trigger, but the hunt rides essentially on
the outfitter and the guide. It may be your tag, but it is also his (or her)
tip, and reputation, when the hunt is over.
A big contrast in a self-guided versus a fully outfitted/guided hunt is getting
your animal out. My hunt was early and hot (August/September). A MAJOR part of
our planning involved dealing with a sheep in warm weather (should we beat the
odds and get one). We had to work quickly with our downed animal to get it cool,
and we had to keep it cool (and protected from critters) until we got it to an
airfield, and then to civilization and a cooler. And yes we did beat the odds
(and get a sheep), and yes it was a lot of work hauling it and our stuff to an
airfield on our backs.
My dad's hunt was later (mid-October) with the full beauty of fall colors and
benefit of cooler weather. A sheep hunt is perhaps a bit unique in that your
backs may still be called upon to serve as a pack animal if the terrain is too
difficult for horses (as was the spot my dad got his ram). Otherwise, the
outfitter hauls the animal out - and with the cooler weather, the task needed
not be done in a panic.
Whereas my self-guided hunt drew on a lifetime of experience and skill, an
outfitted - guided hunt typically draws deep on the average lifetime savings
account. My dad could afford such a luxury; I, in contrast, went economy class,
shooting only camera (well, not entirely).
A big contrast is, or at least can be, food. I say 'can be' because, first,
outfitting and guiding may be decoupled. An outfitter is typically hired to
`outfit' you with a camp, perhaps groceries, and the means to get you and the
stuff in and out (pack animals). Outfitters have designated areas of operation
in Idaho. A guide's job is to guide you to your quarry. In Idaho guides are
sponsored and subcontracted by outfitters. I describe my hunt as self-guided,
but I am not a licensed guide, so, strictly speaking, I can only guide myself.
Perhaps I should refer to my hunt as un-guided. (But that would suggest blind
wandering in the wilderness, which isn't true either.) But on my hunt, in which
the only pack animals were ourselves, all our food went on our back, and thus
was either dried or stripped down Meals-Ready-to-Eat (MREs). Arghh … (but you do
what you have to do). By contrast, depending on the number and strength of an
outfitter's pack animals, all kinds of yummy food can be packed in. My dad's
hunt was complete with all the wonderful milk, juices, pancakes, bacon, sausage,
bread, cheese, lunch meats and mayo, chicken, fresh vegetables, canned pop and
beer, and on and on … all that you would want in a camp. The only thing lacking
was chocolate milkshakes. On the final stalk, however, food was reduced to what
you could carry in your pockets.
Both guided and un-guided hunts require a list. On a self-guided hunt you must
come up with the list yourself. On an outfitted/guided hunt, they should send
you one - of what to bring. On our hunt, 60 pounds is about all we could put in
our packs on our backs, each. On an outfitted hunt, you will each typically be
required to get all of your stuff into two medium size duffel bags, also not to
exceed 60 pounds. For both hunts you'll need the appropriate rifle, ammo,
optics, etc. You will also need to be able to hit your prey (if you want to
bring it home). A guide's job is typically done when he (or she) has presented
you with a reasonably decent opportunity to shoot the animal you hired him (or
her) to help you kill.
On both types of hunts you will need to decide (ahead of time) what animal you
will take, and what you will pass on. The outfitter/guide can help you with this
decision as he or she has a good idea of the trophy potential of your hunt.
Alternately, your selection of an outfitter/guide may have already been governed
by trophy potential. On my hunt I wanted a ram with unbroomed horn ends, better
than barely legal. I passed on a smaller ram, and then got what I wanted. My dad
said he would take any legal ram, and he did. On a self-guided hunt, you will
need to have a taxidermist lined up - and know what to do with your trophy in
the field. On an outfitted/guided hunt - they will help you with your trophy in
the field. They may also have recommendations on taxidermists - but remember -
it is your trophy, going in your living room (or wherever), not theirs - so do
your homework.
On my hunt we spent five days scouting-looking and got my ram on the second day
of hunting. We saw only one group of rams and were at our turnaround point some
eleven miles in. We spent a half a day dressing (or undressing?) the animal and
getting it down to a trail, and then three full days [back-]packing it to a
backcountry airstrip. Once to civilization we got the animal on ice and then
spent a full day retrieving our vehicle left at trail's end. On my dad's hunt we
flew by backcountry charter to a small landing strip some 75 miles by dirt road
and 25 miles by trail from `town'. We met the outfitter at the strip. The guide
was already in sheep country scouting. We saw six or seven rams, plus 20 to 30
ewes and lambs, and my dad got his ram on the first full day of hunting. This
opened up time to hunt other stuff, and on the second full day he got a bull
elk. While waiting for the outfitter to bring our gear and dad's elk to camp, I
bagged a deer. My dad and I both own our own businesses, and while this allows
us to hunt and otherwise take time off whenever we want to, it also requires us
to work sometimes when we don't want to. So we opted to come out early.
In all we both had fabulous hunts. We both `beat the odds'. I took a ram
un-guided (wandering around?) in a difficult unit. My dad had the benefit of
outfitter and guide, but taking the ram on the first full day was definitely
`ahead of schedule'. In fact, we bagged my dad's ram as part of what would have
probably been a two or three day stalk on some other rams. Though the guide had
rams spotted before we arrived, the ram my dad killed was one I spotted en
route. The cool thing about our hunts was that we were able to experience the
whole range of trophy sheep hunting, and much of it we did together.
Endnote ... here